Drawing for DETERMINISTIC DETECTION LOGIC

USPTO serial 90463689

DETERMINISTIC DETECTION LOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SANTIAGO, ALEXIS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DETERMINISTIC DETECTION LOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HADI AL-SHATHIR

HADI AL-SHATHIR THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLAZAST. LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded software for operating LIDAR apparatus sold as a component of artificial intelligence LIDAR apparatusACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 1, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 19, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 19, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 9, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 26, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 26, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 28, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 28, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 16, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance