Drawing for ECO SCOOP

USPTO serial 90628222

ECO SCOOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 973
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO SCOOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Cellulose wipes; Disposable housebreaking pads for pets; General purpose plastic bags; Plastic bags for pet waste disposal; Plastic bags in the shape of tubes for the disposal of pet-waste; Plastic or paper bags for household use; Trash bags; Plastic bags for disposing of pet wasteACTIVEJun 8, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2022KSNRNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO
Dec 15, 2022KSADSUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Dec 13, 2022KSCOSHOW CAUSE ORDER
Nov 23, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 16, 2022CRAFAMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 17, 2022KSNSNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW
May 17, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 6, 2022WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
May 6, 2022WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 5, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance