Drawing for PENGUIN COMPUTING HORIZONAI

USPTO serial 90652031

PENGUIN COMPUTING HORIZONAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENGUIN COMPUTING HORIZONAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Taylor M. Davenport

Taylor M. Davenport Withrow & Terranova, PLLC106 Pinedale Springs WayCary, NC 27511UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing and maintaining applications, software, websites and databases in the fields of artificial intelligence, machine learning and analytic applicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 10, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 2, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 8, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 11, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 29, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 29, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 29, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 29, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 20, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 20, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Nov 5, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 20, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance