CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BIGHORN

USPTO serial 90663892

BIGHORN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIGHORN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelcey Patrick-Ferree

Kelcey Patrick-Ferree Padmanabhan & Dawson, PLLC45 South 7th St.Suite 2315Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural seeds, excluding alfalfa, cauliflower, wheat, beans, fescue, peppers, corn, rapeseed and grassACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 16, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 18, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance