USPTO serial 90682019
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Thomas, Ontario, CA
St. Thomas, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUTH KHALSA
RUTH KHALSA THE IDEAS LAW FIRM, PLLC975 E DAVA DRIVETEMPE, AZ 85283UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting in the field of workplace infection prevention and control, namely, providing advice regarding business operations and business management in the field of disease infection prevention and control in the workplace; Advisory and consulting services in the field of providing businesses with information, tools and resources, namely, providing business management information and tools in connection with consulting and advisory services in the field of strategic planning for the prevention and control of workplace disease infections | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing classes, workshops and seminars in the field of workplace infection prevention and control, and distribution of course materials in connection therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of workplace infection prevention and control, namely, conducting worksite surveys to determine if worksites meet employee health condition requirements and standards | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |