Drawing for NEXSYS

USPTO serial 90709073

NEXSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRADLEY J. THORSON

BRADLEY J. THORSON DEWITT LLP901 MARQUETTE AVENUE2100 AT&T TOWERMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Power supply products for equipment racks, audio-visual equipment, networking equipment, and computers, namely, power distribution units and uninterruptable power supplies for general consumer business and home use, none of the foregoing relating to batteries or battery chargers except as integral components of an uninterruptable power supplyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 1, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 1, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 16, 2024EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 7, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 5, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 5, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Sep 5, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance