USPTO serial 90715735
CRE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Rappold
John M. Rappold RAPPOLD LEGAL, LLC147 CAPE MAY LANEMOUNT PLEASANT, SC 29464UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Commercial and residential real estate agency services; Real estate consultancy; Real estate consultation; Real estate agency services; Real estate brokerage; Real estate brokerage of commercial real estate; Real estate brokerage services specializing in restaurants and other food service related businesses; Real estate investment consultancy; Real estate investment services; Real estate listing; Real estate management; Real estate management consultation; Real estate management of commercial real estate, with a focus on consultation for commercial retail businesses; Real estate management services; Real estate management services relating to shopping centers; Real estate multiple listing services; Real estate procurement for others; Real estate service, namely, rental property management; Real estate services, namely, providing online questions to help users determine the best neighborhoods and communities suited to their individual needs and preferences; Real estate services, namely, rental, brokerage, leasing and management of commercial property, offices and office space; Real estate syndication; Real estate valuation services; Real estate valuations; Appraisal and evaluation of real estate; Assessment and management of real estate; Providing real estate listings and real estate information via a website; Providing real estate listings and real estate information via the Internet; Providing real estate listings via the Internet; Providing a database of information about residential real estate listings in different neighborhoods and communities; Providing a database of residential real estate listings within neighborhoods and communities specifically identified by users; Providing information in the field of real estate; Providing information in the field of real estate by means of linking the web site to other web sites featuring real estate information; Providing information in the field of real estate via a website; Providing information in the field of real estate via the Internet; Valuations in real estate matters | ACTIVE | Dec 8, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 16, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 16, 2023 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |