USPTO serial 90720016
MIRAKEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRER PEREZ, PAUL ANTHONY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIRAKEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JIAWEI PENG
10223 BROADWAY ST, STE P424PEARLAND, TX 77584UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hatchets; Spanners; Folding knives; Fruit knives; Hunting knives; Kitchen knives; Leather sheaths for knives; Multi-function hand tools comprised primarily of pocket knives and also including hand tool components, screwdrivers, files; Pocket knives; Saws for cutting branches; Silverware, namely, forks, knives and spoons that are made of silver or silver-plated; Stainless steel table knives, forks and spoons; hunting, folding, chef, kitchen, butcher, paring, fishing, sport knives | ABANDONED | May 13, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |