USPTO serial 90723285
SUPERIOR SURFACING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YANG, KATRINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERIOR SURFACING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Myers, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leland Wilson
LELAND WILSON DENALI LAW GROUP12600 WORLD PLAZA LNFORT MYERS, FL 33907UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Application of coatings and sealers; Application of coatings for others, namely, applying floor coating; Application of concrete coatings for beautification purposes; Application of epoxy coatings to floors; Application of protective coatings; Application of slip-resistant safety floor coatings and sealers; Application of slip-resistant safety floor sealers; Buffing and polishing; Cleaning of floor surfaces; Concrete polishing; Concrete polishing services; Concrete sealing; Custom polishing of concrete floors according to customers' specifications in terms of equipment, tools, chemicals and process steps used; Floor polishing; Floor polishing and providing information relating thereto; Floor polishing and provision of information relating thereto; Floor sanding; Floor treatment services, namely, application of chemical preparations to floors to make them slip-resistant for safety purposes; General contracting services in the field of flooring; Installation, maintenance and repair of protective coatings for floors; Installing floor tile; Pavement marking services; Pavement sealing; Pavement striping; Pavement stripping; Polishing of concrete floors; Polishing of floors; Sanding of floors; Textile pressing; Textile washing; Tile installation services; Tile laying, bricklaying or block laying | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |