USPTO serial 90754903
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AVRAHAM S.Z. COHN
AVRAHAM S.Z. COHN COHN LEGAL, PLLC697 BROADWAYSUITE #6SOMERVILLE, MA 02144| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated cosmetics; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic masks; Skin care cosmetics; Slimming cosmetics; cosmetics; Non-medicated hand soaps; Non-medicated toiletries preparations; Cleansing milks; shampoos; Liquid body washes; Shower gels; liquid cosmetics for face wash; Cleaning preparations not intended for newborns; none of the foregoing being derived from or containing human breast milk | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Food supplements containing probiotic ingredients, namely, probiotic formulations delivered in capsule and powder form; probiotic supplements containing probiotic ingredients, namely, probiotic formulations delivered in capsule and powder form; none of the foregoing being intended for newborns, infants, and/or children consuming breast-milk or derived from or containing human breast milk | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Powdered milk; Low-lactose milk powder; Cultured milk containing lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria; Yoghurt; Fermented milk; Yoghurt powder; Dried milk powder; Milk; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; Milk substitutes; Condensed milk; Lyophilised milk being freeze dried milk; Lyophilised yogurt being freeze dried yogurt; Milk powder not derived from human breast milk and not containing human breast milk; High-protein milk; none of the foregoing being derived from or containing human breast milk | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services and online retail store services featuring non-medicated cosmetics, cosmetic skin care preparations, dietetic substances and supplements, probiotics, none of the foregoing being intended for newborns and none of the foregoing being derived from or containing human breast milk | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2026 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |