Drawing for ONE VOICE, ONE VOTE

USPTO serial 90769817

ONE VOICE, ONE VOTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROCHA, CAMERON R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE VOICE, ONE VOTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Kriegsman

Edward M. Kriegsman KRIEGSMAN & KRIEGSMAN30 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 9SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for the input, output, storage, processing, communication, authentication of user identification, encryption, decryption, display or printing of data; Computer hardware, computer apparatus and recorded software for the authentication and verification of a transaction; Computer hardware, computer apparatus and recorded software for the authentication and verification of a person's identity; Computer hardware, computer apparatus and recorded software for voice recognition; Electronic display interfaces, namely, read-out apparatus and computer hardware for use in the authentication of cashless payment means; computer hardware and recorded software for security purposes, namely, encryption; data processing equipment, namely, downloadable computer programs, computer interface boards, modems and peripheral equipment; telecommunications apparatus, instruments and recorded software, namely, routers, recorded software for providing access to the internet; components parts and fittings for all the aforesaidACTIVE
042Online identity theft and fraud prevention services, namely, electronic monitoring of personally identifiable information to detect identity theft via the internet; Electronic identity validation services, namely, electronic validation of personal identity to prevent unauthorized access to computer systems; services for the verification of identity and of electronic signatures, namely, providing authentication of personal identification informationACTIVE
045Licensing of computer softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 18, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 18, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 18, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2022GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2022GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2022EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Jul 7, 2022CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
May 27, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 26, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 15, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance