Drawing for ECONTROLS

USPTO serial 90815821

ECONTROLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
QUILICI, BRENDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECONTROLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Quirk

William H. Quirk ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER, LLP755 E. MULBERRY AVE.SUITE 200SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Controls and instrumentation for use in vehicles, namely, electronic engine control modules for spark-ignited engines; electronic diesel engine control modules; land vehicle computer peripherals, namely, electronic engine control modules; electronic ignition controls for internal combustion engines; electronic exhaust control modules for engines; temperature sensors; pressure sensorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 20, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 20, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 18, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 18, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 14, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 14, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2022AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2022IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jan 12, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 2, 2021AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 2, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 13, 2021EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance