USPTO serial 90819719
AURIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AURIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW DELHI, Delhi,, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eyeliner; Eyeliners; Eyeshadow; Incense; Make-up; After-shave lotions; Almond milk for cosmetic purposes; Aromatic essential oils; Aromatic potpourris; Baby lotion; Bath oil; Beauty creams; Body deodorants; Body sprays, namely, water in atomized containers used to produce a cooling effect; Cleansing milk; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Dental rinses for non-medical purposes; Essential oils as perfume for laundry purposes; Essential oils for aromatherapy use; Essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Eyebrow colors; Eyebrow pencils; Eyeliner pencils; Face-powder on paper; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial cream; Facial lotion; Facial washes; Fair complexion cream; Food flavoring, being essential oils; Heat protectant sprays for hair; Incense sticks; Inhalers sold filled with essential oils, not for medical or therapeutic use; Make-up preparations; Make-up removing preparations; Massage oil; Mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; Nail varnish; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin creams with essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Perfume oils; Room fragrance refills for non-electric room fragrance dispensers; Room fragrances; Shaving balm; Skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; Skin care preparations, namely, fruit acid peels for skin; Skin cream; Skin softeners; Skin whitening preparations; Soap powder; SPF sun block sprays; Tooth powder; Tooth whitening creams; Tooth whitening gels; Tooth whitening preparations; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations; Body moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |