Drawing for EZ-BLEND

USPTO serial 90820103

EZ-BLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZ-BLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. McThenia, Jr.

Thomas C. McThenia, Jr. Attorney of record, Florida bar member301 East Pine Street, Suite 1400Orlando, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Adhesive skin patches and bandages for acne treatment, namely, patches containing non-medicated skin care preparations; Medicated cosmetic patches and bandages for skin treatment; patches and bandages for skin treatment, namely, bandages for skin wounds; patches and bandages containing medicated skin care preparations; hydrocolloid bandages for skin wounds and wound care; hydrocolloid bandages for dermatological skin wounds useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 12, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 12, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 8, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 8, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 31, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 31, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 30, 2022ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 23, 2022PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 8, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 8, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 8, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 21, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 13, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance