USPTO serial 90837495
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oleg A. Mestechkin
Oleg A. Mestechkin Mestechkin Law Group PC2218 Ocean AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11229United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Butter; Butter substitutes; Canned fruits; Canned vegetables; Cheese; Cheese curds; Cheese spreads; Cheese substitutes; Chopped nuts; Condensed milk; Cultured milk; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based dips; Dairy-based food beverages; Dairy-based spreads; Dried fruits; Dried vegetables; Edible oil; Farmer's cheese; Feta cheese; Flavored nuts; Greek yogurt; Jams; Jams and marmalades; Kefir; Margarine; Margarine substitutes; Milk; Milk substitutes; Mozzarella cheese; Mozzarella sticks; Olive oil for food; Pickled fruits; Pickled vegetables; Roasted nuts; Sheep cheese; Sheep milk; Smoked fish; Smoked meats; Sour cream; Sour cream substitutes; Sunflower seeds, prepared; Yogurt; Yogurt drinks; Antipasto salads; Cheese dips; Cheese in the form of dips; Cottage cheese; Cream cheese; Dipping oil in the nature of flavored olive oil; Flavored olive oil for food; Frozen, frosted, preserved, processed, dried, cooked or crystallized fruit and vegetables extracts for use in prepared meals or food; Fruit salads; Fruit salads and vegetable salads; Fruit spreads; Fruit-based spreads; Jellies, jams; Meat-based spreads; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Nut-based spreads; Processed cheese; Processed nuts; Processed sunflower seeds; Seasoned nuts; Shelled nuts; Soft cheese; Vegetable salads; Vegetable-based spreads | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |