USPTO serial 90838000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textile handkerchiefs; bed blankets; fabrics for textile use; elastic woven fabrics; velvet; bed linen; household linen; non-paper table linen; bath linen except for clothing; kitchen towels; Plastic table covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, vests, pants, jackets, dresses, trousers, skirts, blouses, coats, suits, uniforms, jogging suits, fleece tops, sweatshirts, sportswear jackets, coats, sweaters, overalls, sportswear shirts and shorts sets, shorts both woven and knit, t-shirts with both long and short sleeves, tops both woven and knit, nightwear; pajamas, lounge wear, robes, one-piece garments for children; footwear; headwear; shirts; leather clothing, namely, vests, pants, jackets, dresses, shirts, trousers, skirts, blouses, coats, suits, uniforms, jogging suits, fleece tops, sweatshirts, sportswear jackets, coats, sweaters, overalls, sportswear shirts and shorts sets, shorts, t-shirts with both long and short sleeves, tops, nightwear; pajamas, lounge wear, robes, one-piece garments for children; belts for clothing; furs being clothing; gloves as clothing; scarves; ties as clothing; hosiery; socks; slippers; beach shoes; ski boots; sports shoes; underwear; aprons | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |