USPTO serial 90858617
THE PROGRESSIVE MINDSET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PROGRESSIVE MINDSET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita C Chipperson
Rita C Chipperson CHIPPERSON LAW GROUP, P.C.5 COLD HILL ROAD SOUTHSUITE 21MENDHAM, NJ 07945Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Business training; Business training in the field of leadership development and executive coaching; Business training, namely, provision of continuing business education courses provided to employees and executives; Providing group coaching and in-person learning forums in the field of leadership development | ACTIVE | May 19, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2022 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |