USPTO serial 90876622
VISUAL INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VISUAL INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Givaataim, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson BRIDGE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES PLLC143 CadyCenter, Suite 209Northville, MI 48167UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Online video on-demand transmission services, namely, the online delivery of video content and video media content for others over public and private computer networks; live streaming and live conference of video content over the Internet; Transmission of electronic digital media and information over the internet or other electronic communications networks, namely, video streaming; internal video communication for businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Encoding of audio and video works, namely internal communication videos, video call recordings, virtual event broadcasts and recordings, video advertisements, online video publishing and editorial content, entertainment works, podcasts, and other video and audio recordings and broadcasts; re-formatting video works for use in multiple formats, namely digital formatting and compression of music and video into video streamable on multiple devices; video data tagging and analytics, namely detection and transcription of spoken words, captioning, detection and transcription of written words onscreen, object detection, brand detection, facial recognition, Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) category, IAB brand safety categorization, bandwidth and storage usage, uploaded video statistics, video playtime, consumption rate, consumption trends, user engagement and other video usage data,; providing online non-downloadable computer software for enabling the transmission of movies and other video media content for others over public and private computer networks; PaaS (Platform as a Service) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence for video management, distribution, video content and usage analytics and monetization via video ads insertion within video content, interactive calls-to-action insertion within video content, insertion of ad-bearing video players withing webpages, sponsorship, and subscription ; Computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an on-line web site for others for video hosting and management and optimization of video content delivery; storing video files on cloud-based servers on behalf of the client and serving those videos on the client's chosen online website; video hosting of digital video content on the internet; providing reporting of video analytics, namely, computer services in the nature of reporting on the technical performance to determine the technological effectiveness of cloud-based video storage, management and organization of the stored video content, and delivery of stored video content to specific categories of viewers using specific classes of device on specific webpages as specified by the client; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software in the form of web based collaborative platforms and community platforms for multi-user project development, uploading, editing, remixing and sharing audio clips and digital video content; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software in the form of a web based interface for the management of web based communities, information, multimedia materials and audio and visual content by others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |