USPTO serial 90877055
COLLIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUENAS, TAYLOR S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLLIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric P. Gros-Dubois, Esq.
Eric P. Gros-Dubois, Esq. EPGD Attorneys at Law, P.A.777 SW 37th Ave Ste 510Miami, FL 33135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development services, namely, creation and production of digital human, virtual reality, and virtual items for use in gaming and cinema; Video game development services, namely, digital human, virtual reality, and virtual item creation; Software design services, namely, digital human and virtual item creation for use in gaming and cinema; Software development services, namely, creation and production of digital human, virtual reality, and virtual items for use in gaming and cinema; Computer graphics design services, namely, digital human and virtual item creation for use in gaming and cinema, character rigging, face rigging, character modeling, and face modeling, for use in the creation, development, and production of motion pictures, television programs, videos, animations, simulations, visualizations, and digital media; computer graphics design services, namely, character rigging, face rigging, character modeling, and face modeling, for use in the creation, development, production, and operation of 2D and 3D games, 2D and 3D interactive game and non-game worlds and virtual environments, virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality and extended reality experiences, 2D and 3D animations, simulations and visualizations, and real-time 3D sites; Computer graphics design services, namely, creation and production of character rigging, face rigging, character modeling, face modeling, digital humans, virtual reality, and virtual items for use in gaming and cinema; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in video game development, film production, television production, video production, product design, and 3D animations, simulations, and visualizations; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in creating, manipulating, and participating in virtual environments; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in creating, manipulating, and participating in virtual environments; computer programming services, namely, content creation for virtual worlds and 3D platforms for use by others; development of 3D content, 3D technology and processes, 3D animation technology, and 3D techniques for use by others; computer graphics design services, namely, creating a 3D asset library for use by others; computer programming services, namely, content creation for use in virtual worlds and 3D platforms created by others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |