Drawing for SINGLE ORIGIN

USPTO serial 90882059

SINGLE ORIGIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELLOTTI, CHRISTINA L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINGLE ORIGIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alyssa M. Worsham

Alyssa M. Worsham WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL ROADPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software using machine learning for managing data in sql databases; downloadable computer software for creating detailed analysis reports regarding optimizing sql queries and database access points, for anticipating future data volumes that may be downloaded from a global computer network, and for providing recommendations related thereto; downloadable computer software for automatically monitoring the quality and performance of sql inquiries and for optimizing database operation related thereto; downloadable computer software for data deduplication; downloadable computer software for facilitating auto-generated software code required to implement such data transfers from one electronic format in a run-time environment, through the generation of customized output code in a variety of different output languages; downloadable computer software programs, namely, a multifaceted software program for use in processing and managing data that allows the user to integrate with third party toolsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 3, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 21, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 3, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 3, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 3, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 3, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 3, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 1, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 1, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 16, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 17, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance