USPTO serial 90888320
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip Nulud, Esq.
Philip Nulud, Esq. Buchalter, a Professional Corporation1000 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose carrying bags; All-purpose reusable carrying bags; Athletic bags; Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Beach bags; Belt bags; Belt bags and hip bags; Canvas shopping bags; Carry-all bags; Clutch bags; Courier bags; Crossbody bags; Duffel bags; Duffel bags for travel; Duffle bags; Evening bags; Imitation leather bags; Leather bags; Leather and imitation leather bags; Men's clutch bags; Messenger bags; Military duffle bags, garment bags for travel, tote bags, shoulder bags and backpacks; Overnight bags; Reusable shopping bags; Reusable textile produce bags to carry produce from grocery stores and farmer's markets; Shoe bags for travel; Shoulder bags; Sling bags; Small bags for men; Tote bags; Travel bags; Traveling bags; Waist bags; Weekend bags; Weekend bags made of hand woven textiles from the Philippines | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, clothing in the nature of shirts, sweaters, tank tops, jackets, pants, shorts, hats, headwear, scarves embellished with hand woven textiles from the Philippines; clothing in the nature of shirts, sweaters, tank tops, jackets, pants, shorts, hats, headwear, scarves representing Filipino and Filipino American culture; modernized filipino clothing in the nature of shirts, sweaters, tank tops, jackets, pants, shorts, hats, headwear, scarves; clothing embellished with graphical print in the nature of shirts, sweaters, tank tops, jackets, pants, shorts, hats, headwear, scarves; clothing embellished with embroidery in the nature of shirts, sweaters, tank tops, jackets, pants, shorts, hats, headwear, scarves; shirts, tank tops, short sleeve shirts, long sleeve shirts, sweaters, hoodies, sweatshirts, sweatsuits, jackets, pants, shorts, shoes, sandals, socks, hats, bucket hats, pajamas, denim pants; barong tagalog, namely, shirts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |