USPTO serial 90895447
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
East Brunswick, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H.E. Bursik, Esq.
401 HAMBURG TURNPIKESUITE 201WAYNE, NJ 07470| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Make-up; Body lotion; Hair care creams; Hair oils; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair rinses; Hair spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Make-up preparations; Shampoo-conditioners; Shower and bath gel; Skin lotion; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |