Drawing for MAYC

USPTO serial 90901415

MAYC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAGIT, JACOB FLEMING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAYC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc A. Lieberstein

Marc A. Lieberstein Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital collectibles in the nature of downloadable multimedia files containing digitally-created artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Digital collectibles in the nature of downloadable image files containing artwork, memes, pictures, and trading cards authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)ACTIVE
035Maintaining and recording ownership of art prints comprised of digital illustrations originating from photographs; Maintaining and recording ownership of downloadable digital illustrations authenticated by nonfungible tokens; Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of downloadable digital collectibles in the nature of artwork, memes, trading cards, pictures, movie clips, music videos, interviews, books, newsletters, magazines, music, podcasts, and soundbites authenticated authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 20, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 20, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 26, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 12, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 12, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Feb 17, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 12, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Oct 11, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 28, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance