USPTO serial 90975730
FROM WITHIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FROM WITHIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine C. Miller
Catherine C. Miller HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Packaged food products, namely, fruit-based meal replacement bars and fruit-based energy bars, and nut-based meal replacement bars and nut-based energy bars, all containing collagen not for medical use; Coffee cream and creamer; Non-milk-based coffee creamers; Coffee creamer for beverages; Milk drinks; Milk based beverages; Milk substitute beverages; Drinks based on non-dairy milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; Iced coffee; Cold brew coffee; Prepared coffee-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FROM WITHIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |