USPTO serial 90976213
BEAUTY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAUTY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAS VEGAS, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vijay K. Toke
Vijay K. Toke PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, tops, dresses, skirts, undergarments, lingerie, hats, scarves, and robes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, panel discussions and workshops in the field of developing a business on social media or creating a social media channel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |