USPTO serial 90977019
VOGU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOGU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Clarke
Robert A. Clarke SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E. VAN BUREN ST.PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Digital collectibles; Digital collectibles provided as non-fungible tokens | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |