Drawing for LIFESTREAM DIRECT NEUROFEEDBACK

USPTO serial 90977866

LIFESTREAM DIRECT NEUROFEEDBACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFESTREAM DIRECT NEUROFEEDBACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark D. Gross

Clark D. Gross LAW OFFICES OF CLARK D. GROSS2029 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 400-NLOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others in the field of neurofeedback apparatus operators to determine conformity with certification standardsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 10, 2025EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 28, 2025TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jan 28, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 28, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2025EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 2, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 2, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 2, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 3, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 3, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 16, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 15, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 25, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 6, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 4, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 4, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 4, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 24, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 6, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 12, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance