Drawing for LASHIONISTA

USPTO serial 97045953

LASHIONISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DAVIS, MARC STEPHEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LASHIONISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam E. Schwartz

ADAM E. SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PLLC244 5TH AVE.#2157NEW YORK, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Manual applicators for applying artificial eyelashes; Trays for artificial eyelashes; Trays for artificial eyelashes, namely, trays for storage of artificial eyelashes and loading of artificial eyelashes into applicators; Kits comprised of manual applicators for applying artificial eyelashes, trays for storage of artificial eyelashes and loading of artificial eyelashes into applicators, and artificial eyelashesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 20, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 11, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 10, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 10, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 10, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 10, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 8, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 26, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 29, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance