Drawing for WALTER'S BEER

USPTO serial 97088983

WALTER'S BEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WALTER'S BEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Hawranek

Scott J. Hawranek MESSNER REEVES LLP105 E. MORENO ST.SUITE 200COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Taproom services; Brewpub services; Microbrewery craft beer brewed on premises; Beer garden servicesACTIVEMay 15, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 7, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 6, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 9, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 9, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
May 9, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 9, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 23, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 9, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 13, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 13, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 25, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 3, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 23, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 28, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 26, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 17, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 26, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance