USPTO serial 97100262
RTPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIOS, SASHA BOSHART
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RTPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Navneet S. Chugh
Navneet S. Chugh CHUGH, LLP15925 CARMENITA ROADCERRITOS, CA 90703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; consulting and advisory services in the field of energy efficiency for oil and gas production; advertising and marketing services; advisory and consulting services by using mathematical, statistical data, statistical software models, machine learning and artificial intelligence; Business planning and strategic services in the oil and gas field by using resource planning tools, namely, performance prediction, logistics, operations and maintenance schedules; Market analysis and research services using data and statistics for the optimization of oil and gas production | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2011 |
| 037 | Consulting services in the field of mining extraction; Consulting services in the field of offshore oil and gas facility construction; Providing technical information in the field of mining extraction; Technical consulting related to the installation of oil and gas equipment, control systems, and machinery | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2011 |
| 042 | Analysis of oil fields; Analysis services for oil field exploration; Data mining; Engineering services in the field of oil and gas services including evaluations, estimates, research and reports in the scientific and technological fields; Scientific and technological services, namely, surveillance, industrial analysis and research services in the field of oil and gas solutions; Technology consultation and research in the field of oil and gas solutions by providing basic data acquisitions for operational data stores, data integration into models and workflows, data visualization and generating reports, converting data into actionable information for effective decision; Engineering services in the field of oil and gas using calculations, physics, mathematical data, statistical software models, advanced computer methods such as data mining, data analytics, machine learning, artificial intelligence for the optimization of oil and gas production; Engineering services in the field of oil and gas using standard and advanced visualization for offline, real time, near real time, monitoring, analysis for the optimization of oil and gas production | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Praesagus Real Time Production Optimization Pvt Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RTPO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |