USPTO serial 97121968
CROP CLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROP CLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Lloyd Serling, Esq.
JOSEPH LLOYD SERLING, ESQ. SERLING ROOKS HUNTER MCKOY WOROB & AVERILL119 5TH AVENUE, 3RD FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CRYPTOCURRENCY TRADING SERVICES; DIGITAL CURRENCY EXCHANGE SERVICES; CRYPTOCURRENCY PAYMENT PROCESSING; PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICES, namely, CRYPTOCURRENCY CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES; CRYPTOCURRENCY TRADING AND EXCHANGE SERVICES, namely, PROVIDING A DIGITAL CURRENCY, DIGITAL TOKEN OR NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN FOR USE BY MEMBERS OF AN ON-LINE COMMUNITY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF A VIRTUAL CURRENCY FOR USE BY MEMBERS OF AN ON-LINE COMMUNITY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, namely, PROVIDING THE ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF DIGITAL CURRENCY, DIGITAL TOKENS OR NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS, INCORPORATING CRYPTOGRAPHIC PROTOCOLS USED TO OPERATE AND BUILD APPLICATIONS AND BLOCKCHAINS ON A COMPUTER PLATFORM AND AS A METHOD OF PAYMENT FOR GOODS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |