USPTO serial 97143213
SOLAR SOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ARRISON, RACHEL MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLAR SOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERICA M. CIPPARONE
ERICA M. CIPPARONE WOLTER VAN DYKE DAVIS, PLLC1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD, SUITE 140ORLANDO, FL 32810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of heating, cooling and environmental control systems using solar energy, renewable energy resources, rainwater, and photovoltaic/solar thermal hybrid systems | ABANDONED | Nov 10, 1991 |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of heating, cooling and environmental control systems using solar energy, renewable energy resources, rainwater, and photovoltaic/solar thermal hybrid systems | ABANDONED | Nov 10, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |