USPTO serial 97151183
VCHARGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with VCHARGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bergisch Gladbach, DE
BERGISCH GLADBACH, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
/Rebecca L. Wilson/
/Rebecca L. Wilson/ THE DOBRUSIN LAW FIRM, P.C.29 WEST LAWRENCE STREETSUITE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements; food supplements based on proteins; food supplements based on minerals; food supplements based on vitamins; vitamin preparations; all of the aforesaid goods being in the forms of effervescent tablets or powders or in the form of squeezable, ready-to-eat, nonliquid gels or pastes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Dairy products, namely, milk, milk enriched with proteins; whey; beverages based on dairy products; milk; milk enriched with proteins; dairy products; flavoured dairy drinks; nut based spreads enriched with proteins; protein powder, namely, dietary supplement featuring protein | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Protein-enriched cereal bars; Cereal-based bars; Cereal-based energy bars; Muesli; Muesli bars; Chocolate-based energy bars; Snacks made from muesli; Protein-enriched chocolate spread; Protein-enriched cocoa-based spread with nuts; Protein-enriched chocolate spread with nuts; Baking mixes; Protein-enriched baking mixes; Carbohydrate-enriched energy gel for dietary supplement purposes; Carbohydrate-enriched gel for boosting energy; Protein-enriched chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Krüger GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by KRÜGER KAFFEE HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VCHARGE
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |