USPTO serial 97227201
RUFFLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUTCHISON, DAVID A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUFFLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat substitutes; Milk substitutes; Plant-based milk substitutes; Textured vegetable protein bits having a bacon flavor; Textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender; Vegetable protein bits having a bacon flavor; Artificial fish roes; Cheese substitutes; Formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; Formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender or meat substitute; Formed textured vegetable protein to be used as an extender or meat substitute; Non-dairy milk substitutes; Nut meats; Nut-based milk; Nut-based snack foods; Nut-based snack foods, namely, nut clusters; Nut-based snack foods, namely, nut crisps; Nut-based spread; Nut-based spread also containing chocolate; Nut-based spreads; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; Processed chickpeas; Soy burger patties; Soy chips; Soy-based food bars; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Soy-based snack foods; Unformed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender; Vegetable-based meat substitutes; Vegetable-based food beverages; Vegetable-based prepared meals for toddlers; Vegetable-based raw food bars; Vegetable-based snack foods; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetarian chili; Vegetarian sausages; Veggie burger patties; packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; packaged soy-based entrees; packaged vegetable-based entrees; packaged vegetarian entrees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |