Drawing for GOING BACK TO CALI

USPTO serial 97263629

GOING BACK TO CALI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AREY, BRANDON LEON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOING BACK TO CALI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

Jill M. Pietrini SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025A full line of clothing; Belts; Footwear; Headwear; NeckwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2025MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Dec 19, 2025ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 18, 2025EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 13, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 12, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 16, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 15, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 14, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 17, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 17, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 17, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 15, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 14, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 6, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 15, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance