USPTO serial 97279987
LA LOMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHAEFER, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with LA LOMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angel Roman Campos
Angel Roman Campos MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE PC125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Cream being dairy products; Whipped cream; Milk beverages, milk predominating; Condensed milk; Dairy products for making ice cream, namely, cream, milk, milk powder, whey and butterfat; milk-based fillings for cakes, namely, mascarpone and mascarpone-based filings; cream cheese | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Powders for making ice cream; Ice cream base in the nature of ice cream mixes; Frozen yogurt in the nature of confectionery ices; Sorbets; Edible ices; Flavoring substances with no essential oils for pastry and confectionery in the nature of syrups; Flavorings other than essential oils, for beverages; Chocolate coating being chocolate topping | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Marketing services in the field of milk products, butter, margarine, cream being dairy products, whipped cream, milk ferments for culinary purposes, buttercream, curd, milk beverages, milk predominating, condensed milk, albumin milk, milk shakes, almond milk for culinary purposes, rice milk for use as a milk substitute, soy milk for use as a milk substitute, peanut milk for culinary purposes, dairy products for making ice cream, dairy products for making confectionery, dairy products for making pastry products, cheeses, binding agents for ice cream, powders for making ice cream, ice cream base, frozen yogurt being confectionery ices, sorbets, edible ices, ice cream based milkshake, industrial machines for making ice cream, apparatus for making ice cream and sorbets, dough for pastry and baking products, powder for pastry and baking products, dough mix prepared for making pastry and confectionery, flavoring substances with no essential oils for pastry and confectionery, flavorings, other than essential oils, for cakes, on behalf of third parties as a commercial intermediary | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |