USPTO serial 97315011
MINKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKSHOOD, AKEELA MOHAMED
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pedro G. Menocal
Pedro G. Menocal PAG LAW PLLC600 BRICKELL AVENUE, SUITE 1725MIAMI, FL 33131United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for processing electronic payments and for transferring funds to and from others.; Downloadable computer software for creating, preparing, managing, sending, processing, tracking and reconciling invoices.; Downloadable computer software for issuing receipts regarding mobile payment transactions.; Downloadable computer software for authentication to control access to communications with computers and computer networks.; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for processing electronic payments and for transferring funds to and from others.; Recorded software for processing electronic payments and for transferring funds to and from others.; Recorded software for creating, preparing, managing, sending, processing, tracking and reconciling invoices.; Recorded software for issuing receipts regarding mobile payment transactions; Recorded software for authentication to control access to communications with computers and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Bill payment services provided via a global communications network.; Clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; Electronic funds transfer; Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; Payment processing services in the field of electronic and credit card payments; Providing an internet website portal in the field of financial transaction and payment processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software; Design, development, and implementation of software for processing financial transactions.; Maintenance of computer software; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for processing financial transactions.; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for use in processing financial transactions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing financial transactions.; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |