CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ROLLI

USPTO serial 97336602

ROLLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. ALEXANDER NOLTE

N. ALEXANDER NOLTE NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL111 BROOK STREET, SUITE 101SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bread rolls; Pizzas; Pizza dough; BreadACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2025MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2025ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2025EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 18, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2024DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 9, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 22, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2023GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 13, 2023GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 13, 2023CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 23, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 3, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance