USPTO serial 97342777
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Proskey
CHRISTOPHER A. PROSKEY BROWNWINICK LAW FIRM666 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 2000DES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Salon services; Barber services; Barber shop services; Cosmetology services; Hair salon services; Hair salon services, namely, hair cutting, styling, coloring, and hair extension services; Hair salon services, namely, treatments to protect hair from effects of exposure to sunlight, heat, humidity and chlorinated water; Hair color salon services; Hair cutting services; Hair extension services; Hair coloring services; Hair styling services; Hair care services; Beauty salon services; Cosmetic body care services; Waxing services; Body waxing services; Facial waxing services; Spa services, namely, providing facial, hair, skin and body treatments; Non-surgical hair loss solution services; Consultation services, namely, hair care consultation services; Consultation services, namely, hair cutting consultation services; Consultation services, namely, hair styling consultation services; Consultation services, namely, hair coloring consultation services; Consultation services, namely, hair extension consultation services; Consultation services, namely, hair loss consultation services; Consultation services, namely, eyebrow care consultation services; Consultation services, namely, eyelash care consultation services; Providing information in the field of hair care; Providing information in the field of hair coloring; Providing information in the field of hair styling; Providing information in the field of hair cutting; Providing information in the field of hair loss treatments; Providing information in the field of hair extensions; Providing educational services in the field of women and men's hair replacement; Providing information in the field of women and men's hair replacement pieces and wigs; Hair replacement services for women and men; Providing educational services in the field of hair extensions; Providing educational services in the field of hair extension systems; Providing educational services in the field of hair care; Providing educational services in the field of hair styling; Providing retail products in the field of hair extensions; Providing retail products in the field of hair extension systems; Providing retail products in the field of hair care; Providing retail products in the field of women and men's hair pieces | ACTIVE | Sep 24, 2018 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |