USPTO serial 97353094
BURGEON BOTANICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEENAN, CAYLA FAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BURGEON BOTANICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toluca Lake, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul E. Thomas
Paul E. Thomas PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, hair sticks; Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, jaw clips; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair barrettes; Hair bows; Hair bows of paper; Hair buckles; Hair chopsticks; Hair clamps; Hair clips; Hair coloring caps; Hair coloring foils; Hair colouring caps; Hair curl clips; Hair curl papers; Hair curlers, electric, other than hand implements; Hair curlers, other than hand implements; Hair curling papers; Hair curling pins; Hair elastics; Hair extensions; Hair grips; Hair nets; Hair netting; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; Hair pieces; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair pins; Hair pins and grips; Hair ribbons; Hair ribbons of paper; Hair rods; Hair scrunchies; Hair slides; Hair ties; Hair weaves; Hair wraps, bonnets and caps used as applicators for hair conditioners; Aluminum foil sheets for hair frosting; Bows for the hair; Bridal headpieces in the nature of ornamental hair combs; Cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair extensions and hair pieces; Clam clips for hair; Electric hair rollers; Electric hair waving implements; False hair; Foam hair rollers; Human hair; Non-electric hair rollers; Pins, other than jewelry, being hair pins; Ponytail holders and hair ribbons; Ribbons for the hair; Rubber bands for hair; Waving pins for the hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |