USPTO serial 97360464
RACKET HEADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RACKET HEADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Woldow
Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST, NW, SUITE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable game software, namely, computer games, virtual reality, augmented reality and cross reality computer games; Downloadable computer game software for smartphones, tablet computers and mobile devices; Downloadable and recorded computer software, namely, computer game software; Exposed cinematographic film; Downloadable and Pre-recorded DVD featuring videos featuring animated cartoons; Mouse pads | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Providing non-downloadable computer games via the internet; Provision of on-line computer games; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Virtual reality arcade services; Virtual reality game services provided on-line from a computer network; Organization, arranging and conducting of computer and electronic game competitions; Entertainment services, namely, production of game shows; Arranging and conducting of conferences in the field of computer and electronic games; Production of films; Publication of computer games, books, magazines and comics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2023 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |