USPTO serial 97380335
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENYA WILLIAMS
KENYA WILLIAMS THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC5823 NEWTON DRIVECARLSBAD, CA 92008UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Laboratory reagents, oligonucleotides, primers and probes, enzymes and enzyme mixes, nucleotide sets and nucleotide mixes, fluorescent dye for scientific, research or biopharmaceutical research use, reaction buffers, sample detection labels in the form of strips of adhesive paper labels for laboratory use for nucleic acid genotyping, nucleic acid quantification and nucleic acid amplification including polymerase chain reaction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for scientific, research or biopharmaceutical research use; Kits comprised of Laboratory reagents, oligonucleotides, primers and probes, enzymes and enzyme mixes, nucleotide sets and nucleotide mixes, fluorescent dye for scientific, research or biopharmaceutical research use, reaction buffers, sample detection labels in the form of strips of adhesive paper labels for laboratory use for nucleic acid genotyping, nucleic acid quantification and nucleic acid amplification including polymerase chain reaction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for scientific, research or biopharmaceutical research use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |