USPTO serial 97476746
CIERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOX III, LYAL L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CIERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka
477 MADISSON AVENUE, 6TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Abrasive cleaning preparations; Abrasive cloth; Abrasive paper; Abrasive paste; Abrasive rolls; Abrasive sand; Abrasive sheets; Abrasive strips; Antiperspirants; Bath gel; Beauty care cosmetics; Beauty soap; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Bleaching preparations for household purposes; Body wash; Breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene; Cleaning preparations for shoes; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetics; Dentifrices; Deodorant for personal use; Dishwasher detergents; Essential oils; Eye cream; Eye make-up; Fragrances; Fragrances for household purposes; Hair care preparations; Hair gel; Hair shampoo; Laundry bleach; Laundry detergents; Leather cleaning preparations; Leather polishes; Nail care preparations; Non-medicated grooming preparations in the nature of shampoos for animals; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated mouth washes; Non-medicated toiletry preparations; Perfumed soap; Perfumery; Plant and herb extracts sold as components of cosmetics; Preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving vehicle surfaces; Shaving soap; Shaving gel; Shoe polish; Shower gel; Toilet soap; Tooth cleaning preparations; Tooth whitening preparations; Toothpaste; Washing preparations and laundry bleach | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2022 |
| 005 | Anti-viral disinfectants; Disinfectant soap; Disinfectant wipes; Disinfectants; Disinfectants for hygiene purposes; Fungicides; Herbicides; Insect repellent preparations; Mosquito repellents for application to the skin; Preparations for destroying vermin; Sanitary preparations for medical purposes | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |