USPTO serial 97511076
ROEANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 973
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROEANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carly Boyd
15728 Lorain Avenue, Unit 45Cleveland, OH 44111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Carpets; Linoleum; Aircraft carpet; Artificial lawn; Automobile carpets; Bathroom rugs; Cloth wall coverings; Coverings for existing floors; Door mats; Tatami mats; Textile wallpaper; Underlay for carpets; Wall coverings of paper; Wallpaper in the nature of roomsize decorative adhesive wall coverings | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | KSNR | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2024 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |