USPTO serial 97542831
CHEXIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 809Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLINT, DANIEL LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CHEXIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARIETTA, GA, US
Marietta, GA, US
Marietta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Andrew Crain
N. Andrew Crain THOMAS HORSTEMEYER LLP3200 WINDY HILL ROAD SESUITE 1600EATLANTA, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultation services relating to computer software for use in secure payment processing and consolidation; Consultation services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others for use in secure payment processing and consolidation; Consultation services in the field of design, development and implementation of customized software and hardware for others; Providing online non-downloadable computer software for use in secure processing of payments via credit card, debit card, smart card, loyalty card, gift card, stored value card, electronic benefits transfer (EBT) card, prepaid card, bank transfer, digital coupons, electronic payments over a global computer information network; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software to enable secure electronic payment acceptance and processing, and to record, manage, and generate reports related to electronic payment processing; Technical consultation in the field of troubleshooting of computer software problems, namely, secure payment processing software problems; Design, development and implementation of customized software and hardware for others for use in connection with secure payment and commercial point-of sale transaction processing; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware for use in connection with secure payment processing and consolidation; Updating of computer software for others, namely, updating of computer software used for electronic payment processing through on-line updates, enhancements and patches; Installation, maintenance and repair of payment computer software for use in electronic payment processing; Providing customized installation and maintenance of point-of sale transaction processing software; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software to digitally verify identification data for enabling age restricted purchasing; Providing a website that features technology that enables users to digitally verify identification data to enable age-restricted purchases; all of the foregoing limited to coordination of merchant payment processing of transactions requiring product-based payment adjudication under a benefit or entitlement program and not relating to banking, lending, or consumer credit or debit reporting | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 30, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |