Drawing for IDD-SM

USPTO serial 97695831

IDD-SM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SCHUTZ, MARISA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDD-SM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jared A. Brandyberry

Jared A. Brandyberry BAKERHOSTETLER1801 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 4400DENVER, CO 80202-2662United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Pipeline maintenance; Consulting services in the field of maintenance of pipelines and pipeline systems in the oil and gas industryACTIVEOct 31, 2022
042Pipeline inspection services, namely, services for analyzing data collected by pigging tools; Pipeline inspection services, namely, services for inspecting pipelines using pigging tools; Design, analysis, development, review, and engineering services for the inspection and maintenance of pipelines and pipeline systems in the oil and gas industry for others; Design, development, and engineering services for pigging tools useful for the inspection and maintenance of pipelines and pipeline systems in the oil and gas industry for others; Design, development, and engineering systems for software for analyzing data collected by pigging tools useful for the inspection and maintenance of pipelines and pipeline systems in the oil and gas industry for others; Consulting services in the field of inspection of pipelines and pipeline systems in the oil and gas industry; Pipeline inspectionACTIVEOct 31, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 18, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 17, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED
Nov 27, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED
Nov 27, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED
Nov 2, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 23, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 18, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 27, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 22, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 2, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance