USPTO serial 97794919
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Daedeok-gu Daejeon, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dmitriy O. Makarov
Dmitriy O. Makarov IPHORGAN LTD.195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD, SUITE #125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1768United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Oxygen generators for cleaning air, namely, air purifying apparatus; air cleaners for industrial purpose; air purifiers for automobiles; ionizing apparatus for the treatment of air used with air cleaning units; air cleaning apparatus; electric air cleaner in the nature of electric air sterilizer and air purifier; wearable air purifiers; portable air cleaners for household use; household air cleaners; air purifiers for strollers; air filters for air cleaners in the nature of air filtering units; filters for filtering air in the nature of air filtering units; filters for sterilizing air in the nature of air filtering units; filters for air purifiers; air sterilizers; air purifying units for industrial purposes; industrial air purifiers; air deodorizing apparatus; electric deodorizing unit for household purposes; electric air purifiers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |