USPTO serial 97794937
BLUEMINGAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUENAS, TAYLOR S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUEMINGAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Daedeok-gu Daejeon, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dmitriy O. Makarov
Dmitriy O. Makarov IPHORGAN LTD.195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD, SUITE #125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1768United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | oxygen generators for cleaning air, namely, air purifying apparatus; air cleaners for industrial purpose; air purifiers for automobiles; ionizing apparatus for the treatment of air used with air cleaning units; air cleaning apparatus; electric air cleaner in the nature of electric air sterilizer and air purifier; wearable air purifiers; portable air cleaners for household use; household air cleaners; air purifiers for strollers; air filters for air cleaners in the nature of air filtering units; filters for filtering air in the nature of air filtering units; filters for sterilizing air in the nature of air filtering units; filters for air purifiers; air sterilizers; air purifying units for industrial purposes; industrial air purifiers; air deodorizing apparatus; electric deodorizing unit for household purposes; electric air purifiers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |