USPTO serial 97801996
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keegan J. Nowlin
KEEGAN J. NOWLIN NOWLIN SCOTT LAW FIRM, LLP4803 N MILWAUKEE AVE STE B-312CHICAGO, IL 60630UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and cocktail lounge services; Bartending services; Catering services; Catering services for indoor events; Catering services for outdoor events; Providing information in the field of drinks, namely, providing information about bartending; Bar and catering services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant, bar and catering services | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |