USPTO serial 97811843
PROGRESSIVE BLACKJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, SLOAN H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROGRESSIVE BLACKJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL H. BLISS
DANIEL H. BLISS HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC450 WEST FOURTH STREETROYAL OAK, MI 48067United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Equipment sold as a unit for playing a casino game, namely, a game cloth layout and printed instructions for playing a casino game; gaming tables for gambling; wagering games, namely, gaming tables with gaming table layouts; gaming tables for playing wagering games with gaming table layouts for use on a gaming table in a casino | ACTIVE | Aug 8, 2023 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing live table games of chance; entertainment services, namely, providing online table games of chance | ACTIVE | Aug 8, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |